Comparison Overview
Empire Express, Inc

Empire Express, Inc
999 Channel Ave, Memphis, Tennessee, US, 38109
Last Update: 06/05/2026
Empire Express, Inc was incorporated May 5, 1985 and has grown over the years to become a strong, respected carrier in the trucking industry. The company is owned by Tim Gatlin, President and CEO, and Ed Gatlin, Founder and Co-owner. Empire serves 48 states and handles...

Swift Transportation
2200 S. 75th Ave, Phoenix, 85043, US
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Swift Transportation is the largest full-truckload motor carrier in North America. Based in Phoenix, Arizona, the Swift terminal network includes over thirty full-service facilities in the United States and Mexico. Swift provides a full line of service solutions, includ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Empire Express, Inc







Swift Transportation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Industry Avg (This Year)
Empire Express, Inc has 36.31% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Swift Transportation in 2026.
Incident History - Empire Express, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Empire Express, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Swift Transportation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Swift Transportation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Empire Express, Inc

Swift Transportation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.