Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Emory Technology TransferEmory Technology Transfer
VS
Thermo Fisher ScientificThermo Fisher Scientific
Emory Technology Transfer

Emory Technology Transfer

1599 Clifton Rd., 4th Floor, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, US

Last Update: 03/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ott.emory.edu
748/1000Moderate

"My hope is that this technology will make millions of people better and not harm a single one.” – Charles M. Epstein, MD, neurologist, founder/director of the Laboratory for Magnetic Stimulation at Emory University, and co-inventor of NeuroStar TMS Therapy® Emory’s Of...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Thermo Fisher Scientific

Thermo Fisher Scientific

168 Third Avenue, Waltham, MA, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.thermofisher.com
825/1000Good

About Thermo Fisher Scientific Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. is the world leader in serving science, with annual revenue of approximately $40 billion. Our Mission is to enable our customers to make the world healthier, cleaner and safer. Whether our customers are accele...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:99,125
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Emory Technology Transfer

Emory Technology Transfer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Thermo Fisher Scientific

Thermo Fisher Scientific

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emory Technology Transfer in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thermo Fisher Scientific in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Emory Technology Transfer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emory Technology Transfer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Thermo Fisher Scientific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thermo Fisher Scientific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Emory Technology Transfer

Emory Technology Transfer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Thermo Fisher Scientific

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE206072925

FAQ

Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer and Thermo Fisher Scientific, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer and Thermo Fisher Scientific, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Emory Technology Transfer or Thermo Fisher Scientific ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Emory Technology Transfer or Thermo Fisher Scientific ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer and Thermo Fisher Scientific, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Emory Technology Transfer and Thermo Fisher Scientific, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1