Comparison Overview
Emmanuel College, Cambridge

Emmanuel College, Cambridge
St Andrew's Street, Cambridge, CB2 3AP, GB
Last Update: 04/04/2026
We're a close-knit, inclusive community & a supportive place for everyone to thrive. Founded in 1584 by Sir Walter Mildmay, and a proud part of the University of Cambridge. Usually known as 'Emma'.

University of Florida
355 Tigert Hall, Gainesville, Florida, US, 32611-3115
Last Update: 29/03/2026
University of Florida is a major, public, comprehensive, land-grant, research university. The state's oldest, largest and most comprehensive university, it is among the nation's most academically diverse public universities. University of Florida has a long history of e...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Emmanuel College, Cambridge







University of Florida






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Emmanuel College, Cambridge in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Florida in 2026.
Incident History - Emmanuel College, Cambridge (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Emmanuel College, Cambridge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Emmanuel College, Cambridge

University of Florida
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
MSI Radix AXE6600 router firmware version v781521 contains a command injection vulnerability in the wps.cgi interface that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands by injecting malicious input through the pin2g, pin5g, or pin6g parameters. Attackers can exploit these unsanitized parameters to execute arbitrary commands on the affected device and obtain root privileges.
CTI-Transmute contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability caused by insufficient neutralization of Vue template expression delimiters in server-rendered user-controlled data. An unauthenticated attacker can create a public conversion whose name or description contains a malicious Vue expression using the application's configured [[ ... ]] delimiters. User profile names may provide an additional injection vector. Although Jinja HTML escaping is applied, the resulting value is subsequently included in a DOM region compiled by Vue. Vue interprets the attacker-controlled value as a template expression rather than ordinary text. By accessing the JavaScript Function constructor from within the expression, an attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the security context of the CTI-Transmute origin. The application's nonce-based Content Security Policy does not prevent exploitation because the Vue runtime compiler requires the unsafe-eval policy exception. The malicious payload is stored by the application and executed whenever another user opens an affected page, such as the public conversion detail page. The victim may be a normal user or an administrator. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to: * Access data available to the victim through the application. * Extract API keys, tokens, or other sensitive information exposed to the page. * Perform authenticated actions using the victim's session. * Modify conversions or other application data. * Escalate the impact by targeting an administrator. A demonstrated payload can use [].constructor.constructor(...) to obtain the JavaScript Function constructor and execute arbitrary code. The regression tests also show that a short first-stage payload could retrieve an uncapped conversion description and evaluate a larger second-stage payload. The patch addresses the vulnerability by registering a global Jinja finalize hook that inserts a zero-width Unicode word joiner inside every Vue delimiter found in server-rendered values. This prevents Vue from recognizing the values as template expressions while preserving their visible representation.
- https://github.com/MISP/cti-transmute/commit/4f43c9181a00262bec2a6dfbc9ff9c50d534e918
- https://github.com/MISP/cti-transmute/commit/522fa8ff8223b12a6128ea3fc2344a77b7b9108d
- https://github.com/MISP/cti-transmute/commit/ad8bf2b8031491cefb552314ef7ff6f4148ca95a
- https://github.com/MISP/cti-transmute/commit/ecfdaef63860a071c6f07afd30156ca77a77ad2b
D-Link DWR-M961 devices with hardware version C1 and software version 1.1.2_C1_202602110044 contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the quicksetup.cgi interface. A remote attacker can write overly long strings to the test4, ssid2, and username fields and execute arbitrary commands by crafting a specific payload, or cause the device to crash.
D-Link DWR-M961 devices with hardware version C1 and software version 1.1.2_C1_202602110044 contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the app.cgi interface. A remote attacker can write an overly long string to the netAcc.addlist[].name field and execute arbitrary commands by crafting a specific payload, or cause the device to crash.
D-Link DWR-M961 devices with hardware version C1 and software version 1.1.2_C1_202602110044 contain a command injection vulnerability in the app.cgi interface. A remote attacker can inject arbitrary malicious commands into the netDig.ping.dst field, resulting in command execution with root privileges.