Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Emirates IslamicEmirates Islamic
VS
Emirates NBDEmirates NBD
Emirates Islamic

Emirates Islamic

AE

Last Update: 22/03/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Emirates Islamic offers a comprehensive range of Shariah-compliant products and services across the Personal, Business and Corporate banking spectrum with a network of 40 branches and 229 ATMs/CDMs across the UAE. In the fast-growing area of online and mobile banking, t...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:4,782
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Emirates NBD

Emirates NBD

Baniyas Road, Opp Dubai Creek Tower, Deira, Dubai, AE

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.emiratesnbd.com
812/1000Good

About Emirates NBD Emirates NBD (DFM: Emirates NBD) is a leading banking group in the MENAT (Middle East, North Africa and Türkiye) region with a presence in 13 countries, serving over 20 million customers. As at 30th September 2023, total assets were AED 836 billion,...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:24,743
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Emirates Islamic

Emirates Islamic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Emirates NBD

Emirates NBD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emirates Islamic in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Emirates NBD has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Emirates Islamic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emirates Islamic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Emirates NBD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emirates NBD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Emirates Islamic

Emirates Islamic

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Emirates NBD

Emirates NBD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
EMI1768217746

FAQ

Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Emirates Islamic company and Emirates NBD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Emirates Islamic and Emirates NBD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Emirates Islamic and Emirates NBD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Emirates Islamic or Emirates NBD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Emirates Islamic or Emirates NBD ?
Between Emirates Islamic and Emirates NBD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Emirates Islamic and Emirates NBD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA