Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Emergo by ULEmergo by UL
VS
WorleyWorley
Emergo by UL

Emergo by UL

2500 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX, 78746, US

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.EmergobyUL.com
756/1000Fair

Emergo provides quality and regulatory compliance consulting to medical device and IVD companies. We assist with medical device registration/approval, regulatory strategy, ISO 13485 and QMS compliance, local in-country representation and post market surveillance in 20+ ...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:253
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Worley

Worley

420 George St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.worley.com
768/1000Fair

Worley is a global professional services company of energy, chemicals and resources experts headquartered in Australia. We’re bridging two worlds, accelerating the shift to more sustainable energy sources, while helping our customers provide the energy, chemicals and ...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:37,624
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Emergo by UL

Emergo by UL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Worley

Worley

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emergo by UL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Worley in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Emergo by UL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emergo by UL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Worley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Worley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Emergo by UL

Emergo by UL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Worley

Worley

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Emergo by UL company and Worley company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Emergo by UL and Worley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Emergo by UL and Worley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Emergo by UL or Worley ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Emergo by UL or Worley ?
Between Emergo by UL and Worley, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Emergo by UL and Worley, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2