Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Emapta MacedoniaEmapta Macedonia
VS
StartekStartek
Emapta Macedonia

Emapta Macedonia

2nd Floor Manhattan Business Center Ulica Vasil Gjorgov 21, Kapishtec, 1131, MK

Last Update: 03/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.emapta.com
753/1000Fair

We prioritize diversity, inclusion, and equality in our workforce.    We believe that a diverse team fuels innovation and drives success. We embrace individuals' unique backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives, fostering an environment where everyone feels valued and...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Startek

Startek

Denver, 80237, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.startek.com
761/1000Fair

A global customer experience (CX) management solutions provider, Startek® delivers best-in-class omnichannel CX, digital transformation and enterprise tech services for leading brands, from Fortune 500s to fast-growing startups. Our innovation and expertise ensure CX ex...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:21,110
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Emapta Macedonia

Emapta Macedonia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Startek

Startek

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emapta Macedonia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Startek in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Emapta Macedonia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emapta Macedonia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Startek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Startek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Emapta Macedonia

Emapta Macedonia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Startek

Startek

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
STA909072825

FAQ

Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Emapta Macedonia company and Startek company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Emapta Macedonia and Startek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Emapta Macedonia and Startek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Emapta Macedonia or Startek ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Emapta Macedonia or Startek ?
Between Emapta Macedonia and Startek, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Emapta Macedonia and Startek, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8