Comparison Overview
Emapta Latam

Emapta Latam
Cra. 16 # 97- 46, Bogota, CO
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We prioritize diversity, inclusion, and equality in our workforce. We believe that a diverse team fuels innovation and drives success. We embrace individuals' unique backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives, fostering an environment where everyone feels valued and...

VFS Global
Unit 201, Level 2, Gate Village 8, DIFC, P.O. Box 114100, Dubai, AE
Last Update: 16/07/2026
As the global leader in trusted technology services, empowering secure mobility for governments and citizens, VFS Global embraces technological innovation including Generative AI to support governments and diplomatic missions worldwide. VFS Global continuously transform...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Emapta Latam







VFS Global






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Emapta Latam in 2026.
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
VFS Global has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Emapta Latam (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Emapta Latam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VFS Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VFS Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Emapta Latam

VFS Global
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.