Comparison Overview

Emaar

VS

Country Garden Group

Emaar

Emaar Square Downtown Dubai, Dubai, undefined, 9440, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

WHO WE ARE Emaar is a pioneer of master-planned communities in Dubai since its inception in 1997. It is listed on the Dubai Financial Market as a public joint-stock company. Building upon the legacy of our flagship Downtown Dubai creations — the iconic Burj Khalifa, Dubai Mall, and Dubai Fountain — our dream is to be the world’s most valuable and trusted company, to enrich lives and to be powered by the best people. With proven competencies in properties, shopping malls & retail and hospitality & leisure, we shape new lifestyles with a passion for design excellence, build with quality and timely delivery. EXPANSION & DIVERSIFICATION Reflecting the pulse of Dubai, our portfolio encompasses developing renowned hospitality & leisure projects, premium shopping malls & Retail assets, as well as Master-Planned Communities and iconic Real-Estate assets. Our hospitality & leisure portfolio includes Address Hotels & Resorts and Armani Hotels & Resorts, among others. We are also the developers of premium shopping malls and retail assets such as the flagship The Dubai Mall – the world’s most visited retail & entertainment venue, Dubai Marina Mall and Souk-al-Bahar. Further, we continuously define the standard for exceptional cultural, entertainment and leisure experiences with destinations such as Dubai Opera, Dubai Aquarium & Underwater Zoo, Reel Cinemas, Dubai Ice Rink and VR Park.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14,425
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Country Garden Group

345 Nathan Rd, Yau Tsim Mong, Hong Kong, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Forbes 500 500 Projects Globally Top 10 Real Estate Company in China Over the past 20 years, Country Garden has been a practitioner in China's urbanization, bringing modernization to landscape and improving the quality of people's lives. Besides Mainland China, Country Garden has also been actively expanding overseas markets since 2012, including Malaysia, Australia, Indonesia, India, Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, Russia, Vietnam, Britain, US and other countries. Pairing your unique skills with our global resources and expertise, Country Garden will give you the career you desire. For more information: http://www.bgy.com.cn/china/index.aspx

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15,670
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emaar-properties.jpeg
Emaar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/country-garden-holding-co--ltd-.jpeg
Country Garden Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Emaar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Country Garden Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emaar in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Country Garden Group in 2025.

Incident History — Emaar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emaar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Country Garden Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Country Garden Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emaar-properties.jpeg
Emaar
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/country-garden-holding-co--ltd-.jpeg
Country Garden Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Emaar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Country Garden Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Country Garden Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Emaar company.

In the current year, Country Garden Group company and Emaar company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Country Garden Group company nor Emaar company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Country Garden Group company nor Emaar company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Country Garden Group company nor Emaar company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Emaar company nor Country Garden Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Emaar nor Country Garden Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Emaar company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Country Garden Group company.

Country Garden Group company employs more people globally than Emaar company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Emaar nor Country Garden Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Emaar nor Country Garden Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Emaar nor Country Garden Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Emaar nor Country Garden Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Emaar nor Country Garden Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Emaar nor Country Garden Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X