Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EM Services (RATP Dev)EM Services (RATP Dev)
VS
Alvarez & MarsalAlvarez & Marsal
EM Services (RATP Dev)

EM Services (RATP Dev)

1, Rue Philidor, Paris, 75020, FR

Last Update: 28/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.em-services.fr/
749/1000Moderate

Filiale du Groupe RATP Dev, EM Services est un cabinet de conseil opérationnel en transport et mobilité durable. Nous intervenons pour les entreprises, les administrations publiques, les acteurs immobiliers, les villes et les territoires pour optimiser et faciliter les ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alvarez & Marsal

Alvarez & Marsal

600 Madison Avenue, New York, 10022, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
782/1000Fair

Alvarez & Marsal is a leading global professional services firm dedicated to helping organizations tackle their most complex business issues, maximize stakeholder value, and deliver sustainable change. Privately held since its founding in 1983, clients select us for o...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:13,906
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EM Services (RATP Dev)

EM Services (RATP Dev)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alvarez & Marsal

Alvarez & Marsal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EM Services (RATP Dev) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alvarez & Marsal in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EM Services (RATP Dev) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EM Services (RATP Dev) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alvarez & Marsal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alvarez & Marsal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EM Services (RATP Dev)

EM Services (RATP Dev)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alvarez & Marsal

Alvarez & Marsal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) company and Alvarez & Marsal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) and Alvarez & Marsal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) and Alvarez & Marsal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EM Services (RATP Dev) or Alvarez & Marsal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EM Services (RATP Dev) or Alvarez & Marsal ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) and Alvarez & Marsal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EM Services (RATP Dev) and Alvarez & Marsal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1