Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

El SuperEl Super
VS
Cencosud S.A.Cencosud S.A.
El Super

El Super

14601B Lakewood Blvd, Paramount, CA, 90723, US

Last Update: 29/04/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Bodega Latina Corporation, doing business as El Super, entered the grocery retail marketplace with its first store in South Gate, California in June of 1997. Headquartered in Paramount, California, El Super is focused on offering the communities we serve exceptional ser...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,593
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cencosud S.A.

Cencosud S.A.

Argentina-Brasil-Chile-Colombia-Perú y Of.Comercial en China, OO

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cencosud.com
792/1000Fair

Cencosud S.A. is a Chilean based multi-format retailer with operations in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru and a commercial office in China. Through its supermarket, home improvement, department stores, shopping centers and financial services divisions, the ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:33,791
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
El Super

El Super

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cencosud S.A.

Cencosud S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for El Super in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cencosud S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - El Super (X = Date, Y = Severity)

El Super cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cencosud S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cencosud S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
El Super

El Super

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cencosud S.A.

Cencosud S.A.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between El Super company and Cencosud S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between El Super and Cencosud S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between El Super and Cencosud S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - El Super or Cencosud S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - El Super or Cencosud S.A. ?
Between El Super and Cencosud S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between El Super and Cencosud S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9