Comparison Overview

Elsevier

VS

Conduent

Elsevier

Radarweg 29, Amsterdam, North Holland, 1043, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

As a global leader in information and analytics, Elsevier helps researchers and healthcare professionals advance science and improve health outcomes for the benefit of society. We do this by facilitating insights and critical decision-making for customers across the global research and health ecosystems. In everything we publish, we uphold the highest standards of quality and integrity. We bring that same rigor to our information analytics solutions for researchers, health professionals, institutions and funders. Elsevier employs 8,700 people worldwide. We have supported the work of our research and health partners for more than 140 years. Growing from our roots in publishing, we offer knowledge and valuable analytics that help our users make breakthroughs and drive societal progress. With the Elsevier Foundation and our external Inclusion & Diversity Advisory Board, we work in partnership with diverse stakeholders to advance inclusion and diversity in science, research and healthcare in developing countries and around the world.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,962
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Conduent

100 Campus Dr, None, Florham Park, New Jersey, US, 07932
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 0 and 549

Conduent delivers digital business solutions and services spanning the commercial, government and transportation spectrum – creating valuable outcomes for its clients and the millions of people who count on them. We leverage cloud computing, artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation and advanced analytics to deliver mission-critical solutions. Through a dedicated global team of approximately 55,000 associates, process expertise and advanced technologies, our solutions and services digitally transform our clients’ operations to enhance customer experiences, improve performance, increase efficiencies and reduce costs. We drive progress in every process for our client including disbursing approximately $100 billion in government payments annually, enabling 2.3 billion customer service interactions annually, empowering millions of employees through HR services every year and processing nearly 13 million tolling transactions every day. Learn more at www.conduent.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 36,834
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsevier.jpeg
Elsevier
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conduent.jpeg
Conduent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elsevier
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conduent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elsevier in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Conduent has 614.29% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Elsevier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elsevier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conduent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conduent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsevier.jpeg
Elsevier
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Open Server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conduent.jpeg
Conduent
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Espionage (F5 source code theft), Financial gain (Conduent breach), Activism (hacktivist attacks on critical infrastructure)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Elsevier company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conduent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Conduent company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Elsevier company.

In the current year, Conduent company has reported more cyber incidents than Elsevier company.

Conduent company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Elsevier company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Conduent company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Elsevier company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Conduent company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Elsevier company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Elsevier company nor Conduent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elsevier nor Conduent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Elsevier company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Conduent company.

Conduent company employs more people globally than Elsevier company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Elsevier nor Conduent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elsevier nor Conduent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elsevier nor Conduent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elsevier nor Conduent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elsevier nor Conduent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elsevier nor Conduent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X