Comparison Overview
Elopak

Elopak
Karenslyst allé 53, Oslo, Norge, 0275, NO
Last Update: 19/03/2026
Elopak is a leading global supplier of carton packaging and filling equipment, and we use renewable, recyclable and sustainably sourced materials to provide innovative packaging solutions. Elopak’s iconic Pure-Pak® cartons are designed with the environment, safety and ...

Amcor
Thurgauerstrasse 34, Zurich, CH, CH-8050
Last Update: 13/09/2026
As a global leader in packaging solutions for consumer and healthcare products, our industry-leading innovation capabilities, global scale and technical expertise help our customers grow and meet the needs of millions of consumers every day. We accelerate the possible b...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Elopak







Amcor






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Elopak in 2026.
Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Amcor in 2026.
Incident History - Elopak (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Elopak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Amcor (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Amcor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Elopak

Amcor
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.