Comparison Overview
Elixia

Elixia
NO
Last Update: 01/04/2026
SATS og ELIXIA fusjonerte i 2014 og skapte en ledende treningssenterkjede med en visjon om å spille en viktig rolle for helsen og livskvaliteten til mennesker i Norden.

LA Fitness
PO Box 55088, Irvine, 92619, US
Last Update: 29/03/2026
LA Fitness is a privately owned fitness club chain. LA Fitness has hundreds of health clubs gyms and millions of members across US and Canada. In an industry often equated with fad and fashion, LA Fitness has steadily increased its presence by focusing on the one lifelo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Elixia







LA Fitness






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Elixia has 42.86% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LA Fitness in 2026.
Incident History - Elixia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Elixia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - LA Fitness (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LA Fitness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Elixia

LA Fitness
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.