Comparison Overview

Elior Group

VS

ABC Consultants

Elior Group

Tour Egée, Paris La Défense Cedex, undefined, 92032, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Elior Group, one of the world's leading operators in contract catering and support services, has become a benchmark player in the business & industry, education and healthcare. Operating in 5 countries, Elior Group is a leader in its main markets, in Europe and North America. Our missions are to earn our guests’ trust, every day, by serving delicious, healthy and eco-friendly meals, and to provide excellent services at the locations of our customers and to those occupying them. Our ambition is to reinvent our business as a social caterer so that we can respond effectively to three major concerns of our guests: ▶ Is what I eat healthy and tasty, and is it good for me? ▶ Will eating also be a pleasurable opportunity for togetherness, and will it be good for us? ▶ Will the impact of what I eat be good for everyone? Key figures: ▶ 3 million guests per day ▶ 5 countries ▶ 97,000 employees ▶ €4,45 billion in revenue ▶ 20,250 restaurants and points of sale ▶ 2,400 sites managed by Elior Services

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25,749
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ABC Consultants

1st Floor Eros Corporate Tower, New Delhi, Delhi, 110019, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

ABC Consultants is India's leading executive search and talent advisory firm, proudly shaping the future of multinationals and Indian businesses for over 50 years. Our team of 150 consultants spans 21 industry verticals and brings an agile mind-set, an empathetic perspective and an entrepreneurial spirit to every client engagement. We have helped our clients hire top-tier leadership talent, driving success stories across diverse industries.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12,674
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elior-group.jpeg
Elior Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abc-consultants.jpeg
ABC Consultants
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elior Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABC Consultants
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elior Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABC Consultants in 2025.

Incident History — Elior Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elior Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABC Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABC Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elior-group.jpeg
Elior Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abc-consultants.jpeg
ABC Consultants
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ABC Consultants company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Elior Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ABC Consultants company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Elior Group company.

In the current year, ABC Consultants company and Elior Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABC Consultants company nor Elior Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ABC Consultants company nor Elior Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ABC Consultants company nor Elior Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elior Group company nor ABC Consultants company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elior Group nor ABC Consultants holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Elior Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ABC Consultants company.

Elior Group company employs more people globally than ABC Consultants company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither Elior Group nor ABC Consultants holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elior Group nor ABC Consultants holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elior Group nor ABC Consultants holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elior Group nor ABC Consultants holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elior Group nor ABC Consultants holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elior Group nor ABC Consultants holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H