Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Eli Lilly Australia & New ZealandEli Lilly Australia & New Zealand
VS
MSDMSD
Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand

Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand

N/A

Last Update: 03/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lilly.com.au
754/1000Fair

Lilly unites caring with discovery to create medicines that make life better for people around the world. Three long-established core values guide Lilly in all that we do: Integrity: We conduct our business consistently with all applicable laws. We are honest in our ...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MSD

MSD

90 E Scott Ave, Rahway, New Jersey, US, 07065

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.msd.com
766/1000Fair

At MSD, known as Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA in the United States and Canada, we are unified around our purpose: We use the power of leading-edge science to save and improve lives around the world. For more than 130 years, we have brought hope to humanity through...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:40,830
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand

Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MSD

MSD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MSD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand

Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MSD

MSD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MSD0602706111825

FAQ

Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand company and MSD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand and MSD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand and MSD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand or MSD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand or MSD ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand and MSD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eli Lilly Australia & New Zealand and MSD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA