Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Eli Lilly ItaliaEli Lilly Italia
VS
MANKIND PHARMA LTDMANKIND PHARMA LTD
Eli Lilly Italia

Eli Lilly Italia

Viale Gramsci 731-733, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, IT

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lilly.it/
762/1000Fair

L’attività di Lilly Italia inizia nel 1959 a Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze. Oggi l’affiliata copre una superficie di 85.000 mq, impiega circa 1.500 persone, di cui oltre 900 nel sito manifatturiero, uno dei più grandi stabilimenti per la produzione di farmaci da biotecnolog...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MANKIND PHARMA LTD

MANKIND PHARMA LTD

Phase 3, New Delhi, IN

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mankindpharma.com
779/1000Fair

Mankind Pharma, one of the top 5 leading pharmaceutical companies in India, started its journey in 1995. Today, we have an employee base of over 20,000 and are racing towards $1 Billion. At Mankind, we aspire to aid the community in leading a healthy life by formulating...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:17,740
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eli Lilly Italia

Eli Lilly Italia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MANKIND PHARMA LTD

MANKIND PHARMA LTD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eli Lilly Italia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MANKIND PHARMA LTD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eli Lilly Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eli Lilly Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MANKIND PHARMA LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MANKIND PHARMA LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eli Lilly Italia

Eli Lilly Italia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MANKIND PHARMA LTD

MANKIND PHARMA LTD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia company and MANKIND PHARMA LTD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia and MANKIND PHARMA LTD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia and MANKIND PHARMA LTD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eli Lilly Italia or MANKIND PHARMA LTD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eli Lilly Italia or MANKIND PHARMA LTD ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia and MANKIND PHARMA LTD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eli Lilly Italia and MANKIND PHARMA LTD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA