Comparison Overview
斯堪的亚电子(上海)有限公司

斯堪的亚电子(上海)有限公司
徐汇区沪闵路9335号, 上海, 200235, CN
Last Update: 20/04/2026
Elektroskandia China has been operating in Shanghai, China since 1999 and we are the leading professional in the market of Telecom Network Installation Material, Electrical Business and Renewable Energy Business. We offer custom made solutions according to each indiv...

TIM
Via Gaetano Negri, 1, Milano, 20123, IT
Last Update: 30/03/2026
We are driving the digital transition of Italy and Brazil with innovative technologies and services because we want to contribute to accelerating the sustainable growth of the economy and society by bringing value and prosperity to people, companies and institutions. W...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

斯堪的亚电子(上海)有限公司







TIM






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for 斯堪的亚电子(上海)有限公司 in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TIM in 2026.
Incident History - 斯堪的亚电子(上海)有限公司 (X = Date, Y = Severity)
斯堪的亚电子(上海)有限公司 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TIM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TIM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

斯堪的亚电子(上海)有限公司

TIM
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.