Comparison Overview
Elektra

Elektra
Insurgentes Sur 3579, México, 14020, MX
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Con más de 72 años de experiencia, en Elektra creamos momentos felices brindando la mejor experiencia de compra omnicanal a nuestros clientes. Somos la compañía de retail con el mayor crecimiento en los últimos años en México y Latinoamérica. Actualmente, contamos con ...

Mercadona
Calle Alfonso Roig Alfonso, Albalat dels Sorells, 46135, ES
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Mercadona is a leading company of physical supermarkets in Spain with an online service, with over 1,610 stores and more than 5.9 million households as customers. Additionally, it has 60 stores in Portugal, with a presence in nine different districts. A family-owned co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Elektra







Mercadona






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Elektra in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mercadona in 2026.
Incident History - Elektra (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Elektra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mercadona (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mercadona cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Elektra

Mercadona
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.