Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Electrolux Professional SuomiElectrolux Professional Suomi
VS
Atlas Copco GroupAtlas Copco Group
Electrolux Professional Suomi

Electrolux Professional Suomi

Lautatarhankatu 8, Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00580, FI

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
745/1000Moderate

Electrolux Professional on ammattikeittiö- ja ammattipesularatkaisuiden luotettava ja globaali kumppani, joka tarjoaa kustannustehokkaita ja työskentelyä helpottavia tuotteita – vastuullisesti ja asiakaslähtöisesti.

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, 10523, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

Atlas Copco Group enables technology that transforms the future. We innovate to develop products, services and solutions that are key to our customers’ success. Our four business areas offer compressed air and vacuum solutions, energy solutions, dewatering and industria...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:48,857
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Electrolux Professional Suomi

Electrolux Professional Suomi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electrolux Professional Suomi in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Electrolux Professional Suomi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electrolux Professional Suomi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlas Copco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Copco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Electrolux Professional Suomi

Electrolux Professional Suomi

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi and Atlas Copco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi and Atlas Copco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Electrolux Professional Suomi or Atlas Copco Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Electrolux Professional Suomi or Atlas Copco Group ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi and Atlas Copco Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Electrolux Professional Suomi and Atlas Copco Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9