Comparison Overview
Electrolux Professional Suomi

Electrolux Professional Suomi
Lautatarhankatu 8, Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00580, FI
Last Update: 22/04/2026
Electrolux Professional on ammattikeittiö- ja ammattipesularatkaisuiden luotettava ja globaali kumppani, joka tarjoaa kustannustehokkaita ja työskentelyä helpottavia tuotteita – vastuullisesti ja asiakaslähtöisesti.

Atlas Copco Group
Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, 10523, SE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Atlas Copco Group enables technology that transforms the future. We innovate to develop products, services and solutions that are key to our customers’ success. Our four business areas offer compressed air and vacuum solutions, energy solutions, dewatering and industria...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Electrolux Professional Suomi







Atlas Copco Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Electrolux Professional Suomi in 2026.
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco Group in 2026.
Incident History - Electrolux Professional Suomi (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Electrolux Professional Suomi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Atlas Copco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atlas Copco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Electrolux Professional Suomi

Atlas Copco Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.