Comparison Overview

EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel)

VS

CRRC Corporation Ltd.

EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel)

9301 West 55th Street, LaGrange, Illinois, 60525, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Progress Rail, a Caterpillar company, designs and manufactures EMD rolling stock products and services for global railroad customers. Our products include new, used and remanufactured locomotives, transit units and freight cars, with parts, component reconditioning, repair and leasing services. We are a premier employer within the rail industry, with products and services represented in over 100 countries around the world. With operations in the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, India, Italy, Mexico, South Africa and the United Kingdom, we are continually expanding our footprint. Becoming a part of the team means becoming a part of a rich heritage and a bright future in our global marketplace. Our goal is to recruit, hire and develop a skilled workforce to meet the challenges of the future. Within Progress Rail, there exists a wide range of rewarding assignments and career paths. Our greatest strength and advantage in the marketplace is our commitment to our customers and our people.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 745
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CRRC Corporation Ltd.

None, None, Beijing, None, CN, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

CRRC undertakes design, manufacture, testing, commissioning and maintenance of locomotives and rolling stock, including: electric locomotives, diesel-electric and diesel-hydraulic locomotives from 280 kw to 10,000 kw for mainline and shunting duties; high-speed trains of speed over 350 km/h; DMUs and EMUs for urban, suburban and regional transport; trams and light rail vehicles; metro cars and passenger coaches; as well as full line of freight wagons, such as covered wagons; open-top wagons for coal, ore, steel and timber; hopper wagons for grain, ore, fertilizer; flat wagons; double-deck container flat wagons; tank wagons for all types of liquid and chemicals; tipper wagons, schnabel and depressed center wagons, as well as track machinery.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 347
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electro-motive-diesel.jpeg
EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crrc-corporation-ltd.jpeg
CRRC Corporation Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CRRC Corporation Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CRRC Corporation Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CRRC Corporation Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CRRC Corporation Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electro-motive-diesel.jpeg
EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crrc-corporation-ltd.jpeg
CRRC Corporation Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CRRC Corporation Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CRRC Corporation Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company.

In the current year, CRRC Corporation Ltd. company and EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. company nor EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. company nor EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CRRC Corporation Ltd. company nor EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CRRC Corporation Ltd. company.

EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) company employs more people globally than CRRC Corporation Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EMD (Electro-Motive Diesel) nor CRRC Corporation Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H