Elastic
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
elastic
Website:
Employees number:
27
Number of followers:
6,907
NAICS:
541613
Industry Type:
Homepage:
elasticgroup.com.au
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
ELA_2996467
Scan Status:
In-progress
Elastic Company CyberSecurity Posture
elasticgroup.com.au
STRETCH YOUR THINKING Elastic - part of IVE Group - is a creative production agency founded on ingenuity, technology and experience. We blend business with creativity, curiosity with innovation and originality with collaboration. We’re passionate about working with our clients to understand their business from the inside out, helping identify opportunities through better creative communications. For over 18 years we have been delivering creative & production services across Australia and South-East Asia from our offices in Sydney and Melbourne.
Elastic A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Elastic Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Elastic
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Elastic Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Elastic
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Elastic Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Elastic
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Elastic disclosed a critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-37735) in **Elastic Defend for Windows**, stemming from improper file permission preservation in its SYSTEM-privileged service. The flaw allows local attackers—even with low privileges—to delete arbitrary files, potentially escalating to full administrative control over compromised systems. Affected versions include **8.19.5 and earlier**, as well as **9.0.0 through 9.1.5**, with patched releases (8.19.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.0) now available. While exploitation requires local access and moderate complexity (CVSS 7.0: High), the risk is amplified in shared or multi-user environments where insiders or compromised accounts could abuse the vulnerability. Organizations relying on Elastic Defend for endpoint security face heightened exposure, as successful exploitation undermines system integrity, enables lateral movement, and could facilitate follow-on attacks like data theft or ransomware deployment. Mitigations include immediate patching or upgrading to **Windows 11 24H2**, which introduces architectural safeguards. Delayed remediation risks persistent privilege escalation threats, particularly in environments with untrusted local users or legacy Windows versions.
Elastic Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Elastic
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)
Elastic has 9.89% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Elastic has 56.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Elastic vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Elastic reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 1 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Elastic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Elastic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Elastic Company Subsidiaries
STRETCH YOUR THINKING Elastic - part of IVE Group - is a creative production agency founded on ingenuity, technology and experience. We blend business with creativity, curiosity with innovation and originality with collaboration. We’re passionate about working with our clients to understand their business from the inside out, helping identify opportunities through better creative communications. For over 18 years we have been delivering creative & production services across Australia and South-East Asia from our offices in Sydney and Melbourne.
Loading...
Elastic Similar Companies
dentsu
We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experience, underpinned by modern cr
Quad (NYSE: QUAD) is a global marketing experience company that helps brands make direct consumer connections, from household to in-store to online. Supported by state-of-the-art technology and data-driven intelligence, Quad uses its suite of media, creative and production solutions to streamline th
TBWA\Worldwide
TBWA is The Disruption Company®. We are a Collective of creative minds with an unlimited creative canvas. We create brand platforms that defy convention and compete with culture. Thanks to our trademarked Disruption® methodology, we build the world’s strongest brands. Brands that own an unfair share
Clear Channel Europe
Clear Channel Europe is a division of leading global Out of Home media company, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CCO). The Clear Channel Europe portfolio spans 14 markets with 260,000 advertising panels. Clear Channel Europe has 2,600 dedicated employees. Our Mission is To Create the fu
IPG Mediabrands
IPG Mediabrands is the media and marketing solutions division of Interpublic Group (NYSE: IPG). IPG Mediabrands manages over $47 billion in marketing investment globally on behalf of its clients across its full-service agency networks UM, Initiative and Mediahub and through its award-winning special
Ogilvy
Ogilvy has been creating impact for brands through iconic, culture-changing, value-driving ideas since the company was founded by David Ogilvy 75 years ago. We build on that rich legacy through Borderless Creativity – innovating at the intersections of its advertising, public relations, relationship
Havas
TO MAKE A MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE TO BRANDS, TO BUSINESSES AND TO PEOPLE Founded in 1835 in Paris, Havas is one of the world’s largest global communications networks, with more than 23,000 people in over 100 markets sharing one single mission: to make a meaningful difference to brands, businesses, a
Founded in 1926 by Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet, today Publicis Groupe is the largest communications group in the world and a leader in marketing, communication, and digital business transformation, led by Arthur Sadoun, the third CEO in its history. Publicis Groupe is positioned at every step of the
Clinic
Clinic is an independent creative agency. We create bold ideas, and craft them beautifully, to get people thinking, believing and doing. All of our experience goes into what we do today, and although our world’s constantly changing, the endpoint is still people and their experience, no matter
.png)
Elastic CyberSecurity News
November 25, 2025 02:00 PM
Neon Cyber Joins Forces with Elastic to Protect Modern Workforces from Identity-Based Threats with Comprehensive Browser and SaaS Security
Strategic technology partnership delivers easy-to-deploy enterprise-wide protection, enhancing visibility and threat detection.
November 23, 2025 09:50 PM
Reshaping cyber security roles: How AI enhances teams without replacing humans
As threats grow more sophisticated, agentic AI helps cyber security teams work smarter by handling routine tasks and helping junior analysts...
November 17, 2025 08:00 AM
ECS Recognized as a Top Partner with 2025 Elastic Services Partner Award – AMER
Company honored as a top services partner for Elastic in the Americas advancing customer success with Elastic Search AI. FAIRFAX, Va.
November 10, 2025 02:06 AM
What’s the potential of agentic AI for public sector cybersecurity?
Elastic's CISO, Mandy Andress, highlighted two key aspects to enhancing security for the public sector: speed and context, for which agentic...
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
Researchers Use Call Gadgets to Evade Elastic EDR Call-Stack Signatures
Security researchers have uncovered a sophisticated technique that exploits call gadgets to bypass Elastic EDR's signature-based detection...
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
Researchers Evaded Elastic EDR's Call Stack Signatures by Exploiting Call Gadgets
Security researchers have successfully evaded Elastic EDR's call stack signature detection by exploiting a technique involving "call...
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
Researchers Bypass Elastic EDR Call-Stack Signatures Using Call Gadgets
Researchers insert arbitrary modules into the call stack during module loading, successfully bypassing Elastic EDR's signature-based...
October 31, 2025 07:00 AM
New Linux Singularity Rootkit using Sophisticated Technique to Evade Elastic EDR Detection
New Linux Singularity Rootkit using Sophisticated Technique to Evade Elastic EDR Detection ... A sophisticated Linux kernel rootkit designed to...
October 31, 2025 07:00 AM
Researchers Build Linux Rootkit That Evades Elastic Security EDR Detection
The Singularity rootkit employs multiple obfuscation and evasion techniques to defeat static signature analysis and behavioral monitoring...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Elastic CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Elastic
The official website of Elastic is https://www.elasticgroup.com.au/.
Elastic’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Elastic’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 775, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Elastic’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Elastic currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Elastic have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Elastic is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Elastic have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Elastic does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Elastic comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Elastic is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Elastic have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Elastic does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Elastic comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Elastic is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Elastic have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Elastic is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Elastic
Elastic operates primarily in the Advertising Services industry.
Number of Employees at Elastic
Elastic employs approximately 27 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Elastic
Elastic presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Elastic’s LinkedIn Followers
Elastic’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 6,907 followers.
NAICS Classification of Elastic
Elastic is classified under the NAICS code 541613, which corresponds to Marketing Consulting Services.
Elastic’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Elastic does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Elastic’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Elastic maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/elastic.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Elastic
As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Elastic has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Elastic has an estimated 32,427 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Elastic ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.
How does Elastic detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with immediate upgrade to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.0), containment measures with interim mitigation: upgrade to windows 11 24h2 (reduces exploitability), and remediation measures with patch deployment across all affected systems, remediation measures with inventory of elastic defend deployments to identify vulnerable versions, remediation measures with prioritization of critical infrastructure updates, and communication strategy with public security advisory by elastic, communication strategy with urgent notification to customers via standard channels..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Elastic Defend Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (CVE-2025-37735)
Description: Elastic has released a security advisory addressing a significant vulnerability in Elastic Defend (CVE-2025-37735) that could allow attackers to escalate their privileges on Windows systems. The flaw stems from improper preservation of file permissions in the Defend service, enabling local attackers to delete arbitrary files and potentially gain administrative control. Affected versions include 8.19.5 and earlier, as well as 9.0.0 through 9.1.5. Patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.0) are available, and organizations are urged to prioritize remediation.
Type: Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation
Attack Vector: Local access with low privileges; improper file permission preservation in Elastic Defend service (SYSTEM-level)
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-37735 (Improper Preservation of Permissions)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Systems Affected: Os: Windows (all versions, with mitigation in Windows 11 24H2), Software: Elastic Defend (versions 8.19.5 and earlier; 9.0.0–9.1.5).
Operational Impact: High (potential for full administrative control by low-privilege attackers; critical infrastructure risk)
Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate (public disclosure of high-severity vulnerability in security product)
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Entity Name: Elastic (vendor)
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Cybersecurity / Software
Customers Affected: Organizations using Elastic Defend for Windows (versions 8.19.5 and earlier; 9.0.0–9.1.5)
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Entity Name: Organizations using vulnerable Elastic Defend versions
Entity Type: Customer Base
Industry: Multiple (any sector using Elastic Defend on Windows)
Location: Global
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Containment Measures: Immediate upgrade to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.0)Interim mitigation: Upgrade to Windows 11 24H2 (reduces exploitability)
Remediation Measures: Patch deployment across all affected systemsInventory of Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable versionsPrioritization of critical infrastructure updates
Communication Strategy: Public security advisory by ElasticUrgent notification to customers via standard channels
Data Breach Information
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Patch deployment across all affected systems, Inventory of Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable versions, Prioritization of critical infrastructure updates, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by immediate upgrade to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.0), interim mitigation: upgrade to windows 11 24h2 (reduces exploitability) and .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Lessons Learned: Critical importance of patching security products promptly, even for 'local access' vulnerabilities, Need for defense-in-depth against privilege escalation paths in endpoint protection tools, Value of OS-level mitigations (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 architectural changes) as interim protections
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Recommendations: Upgrade Elastic Defend to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, or 9.2.0) immediately, Conduct emergency inventory of all Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable systems, Prioritize patching for systems with high-value data or critical roles, Consider upgrading to Windows 11 24H2 as an interim mitigation for systems that cannot be patched immediately, Review and harden least-privilege access controls for all local users, Monitor for suspicious file deletion activity or privilege escalation attemptsUpgrade Elastic Defend to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, or 9.2.0) immediately, Conduct emergency inventory of all Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable systems, Prioritize patching for systems with high-value data or critical roles, Consider upgrading to Windows 11 24H2 as an interim mitigation for systems that cannot be patched immediately, Review and harden least-privilege access controls for all local users, Monitor for suspicious file deletion activity or privilege escalation attemptsUpgrade Elastic Defend to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, or 9.2.0) immediately, Conduct emergency inventory of all Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable systems, Prioritize patching for systems with high-value data or critical roles, Consider upgrading to Windows 11 24H2 as an interim mitigation for systems that cannot be patched immediately, Review and harden least-privilege access controls for all local users, Monitor for suspicious file deletion activity or privilege escalation attemptsUpgrade Elastic Defend to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, or 9.2.0) immediately, Conduct emergency inventory of all Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable systems, Prioritize patching for systems with high-value data or critical roles, Consider upgrading to Windows 11 24H2 as an interim mitigation for systems that cannot be patched immediately, Review and harden least-privilege access controls for all local users, Monitor for suspicious file deletion activity or privilege escalation attemptsUpgrade Elastic Defend to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, or 9.2.0) immediately, Conduct emergency inventory of all Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable systems, Prioritize patching for systems with high-value data or critical roles, Consider upgrading to Windows 11 24H2 as an interim mitigation for systems that cannot be patched immediately, Review and harden least-privilege access controls for all local users, Monitor for suspicious file deletion activity or privilege escalation attemptsUpgrade Elastic Defend to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, or 9.2.0) immediately, Conduct emergency inventory of all Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable systems, Prioritize patching for systems with high-value data or critical roles, Consider upgrading to Windows 11 24H2 as an interim mitigation for systems that cannot be patched immediately, Review and harden least-privilege access controls for all local users, Monitor for suspicious file deletion activity or privilege escalation attempts
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Critical importance of patching security products promptly, even for 'local access' vulnerabilities,Need for defense-in-depth against privilege escalation paths in endpoint protection tools,Value of OS-level mitigations (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 architectural changes) as interim protections.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Source: Elastic Security Advisory
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Source: CVE-2025-37735 Details
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Elastic Security Advisory, and Source: CVE-2025-37735 Details.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Investigation Status: Resolved (patch available; advisory published)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Security Advisory By Elastic and Urgent Notification To Customers Via Standard Channels.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Stakeholder Advisories: Elastic has issued a public security advisory with technical details and remediation guidance.
Customer Advisories: Customers notified via standard channels (email, in-product alerts, etc.) to apply patches urgently.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Elastic has issued a public security advisory with technical details and remediation guidance., Customers notified via standard channels (email, in-product alerts and etc.) to apply patches urgently..
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability / Privilege Escalation ELA0132601111025
Root Causes: Improper Preservation Of File Permissions In Elastic Defend Service (System-Level Process), Insufficient Validation Of File Operations By Low-Privilege Users, Lack Of Fail-Safe Mechanisms For Permission Inheritance During File Handling,
Corrective Actions: Implemented Proper Permission Preservation In Patched Versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.0), Enhanced Testing For Privilege Escalation Vectors In File-Handling Routines, Added Os Compatibility Checks For Windows 11 24H2 Mitigations,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Implemented Proper Permission Preservation In Patched Versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, 9.2.0), Enhanced Testing For Privilege Escalation Vectors In File-Handling Routines, Added Os Compatibility Checks For Windows 11 24H2 Mitigations, .
Additional Questions
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were O, s, :, , W, i, n, d, o, w, s, , (, a, l, l, , v, e, r, s, i, o, n, s, ,, , w, i, t, h, , m, i, t, i, g, a, t, i, o, n, , i, n, , W, i, n, d, o, w, s, , 1, 1, , 2, 4, H, 2, ), ,, S, o, f, t, w, a, r, e, :, , E, l, a, s, t, i, c, , D, e, f, e, n, d, , (, v, e, r, s, i, o, n, s, , 8, ., 1, 9, ., 5, , a, n, d, , e, a, r, l, i, e, r, ;, , 9, ., 0, ., 0, –, 9, ., 1, ., 5, ), ,, .
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Immediate upgrade to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6 and 9.2.0)Interim mitigation: Upgrade to Windows 11 24H2 (reduces exploitability).
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Value of OS-level mitigations (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 architectural changes) as interim protections.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Prioritize patching for systems with high-value data or critical roles, Conduct emergency inventory of all Elastic Defend deployments to identify vulnerable systems, Monitor for suspicious file deletion activity or privilege escalation attempts, Upgrade Elastic Defend to patched versions (8.19.6, 9.1.6, or 9.2.0) immediately, Consider upgrading to Windows 11 24H2 as an interim mitigation for systems that cannot be patched immediately and Review and harden least-privilege access controls for all local users.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are CVE-2025-37735 Details and Elastic Security Advisory.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Resolved (patch available; advisory published).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Elastic has issued a public security advisory with technical details and remediation guidance., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Customers notified via standard channels (email, in-product alerts and etc.) to apply patches urgently.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.
Description
An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.
Description
Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=elastic' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
