Comparison Overview

EHR.Network

VS

Capita

EHR.Network

No.39, 2nd Floor, NGEF Lane, Bangalore, 560038, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://http://ehr.network

EHR.Network is a data-first platform powered by openEHR for various stakeholders of the healthcare ecosystem. EHR.Network unlocks data value by making it accessible and inter-operable for companies and individuals to generate insights, securely within and across organizations. Value creation is linked to data access and use. Value is generated by the insights resulting from asking better questions of data - whether it belongs to companies themselves or to others with whom they can partner. We are an open standards based Healthcare Information Platform. It is aligned to EHR standards and is designed to accept data from any source, normalize them and present them as an integrated, comprehensive EHR data of a person. This person centric EHR data is intended to be freely shareable with any person authorized to view it. The platform provides open APIs and SDKs to enable third parties to develop healthcare related applications that leverage the EHR data on the platform to provide enhanced services.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Capita

2 Kingdom Street, First Floor, London, England, GB, W2 6BD
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 550 and 599
http://www.capita.com

Capita is an outsourcer, helping clients across the public and private sectors run complex business processes more efficiently, creating better consumer experiences. Operating across eight countries, Capita’s 34,000 colleagues support primarily UK and European clients with people-based services underpinned by market-leading technology. We’re a vital support service for our clients, enabling the everyday interactions that we expect to run seamlessly, to run seamlessly. A publicly listed business with adjusted revenue of £2.4bn, Capita’s areas of focus are Central Government, Local Public Service, Defence, Learning, Fire & Security, Contact Centres and Pensions Solutions. We’re embracing change to respond to the ever-changing needs of society, creating better outcomes for all our stakeholders.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 25,516
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ehrnetwork.jpeg
EHR.Network
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capita.jpeg
Capita
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
EHR.Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capita
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EHR.Network in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capita in 2026.

Incident History — EHR.Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EHR.Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ehrnetwork.jpeg
EHR.Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capita.jpeg
Capita
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Access to internal Microsoft Office 365 apps
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious File Download (Phishing/Social Engineering)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Demand, Data Exfiltration for Leverage)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

EHR.Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capita company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Capita company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to EHR.Network company.

In the current year, Capita company and EHR.Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Capita company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while EHR.Network company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Capita company and EHR.Network company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Capita company nor EHR.Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither EHR.Network company nor Capita company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither EHR.Network nor Capita holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capita company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to EHR.Network company.

Capita company employs more people globally than EHR.Network company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither EHR.Network nor Capita holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Capita holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Capita holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Capita holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Capita holds HIPAA certification.

Neither EHR.Network nor Capita holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References