Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Federal Finance AdministrationFederal Finance Administration
VS
CKA Birla GroupCKA Birla Group
Federal Finance Administration

Federal Finance Administration

Bundesgasse 3, Bern, undefined, 3011, CH

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.efv.admin.ch
745/1000Moderate

At the Federal Finance Administration, you can expect highly qualified colleagues, an open communication culture, a pleasant working environment and the usual attractive working conditions offered by the Confederation.

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:108
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CKA Birla Group

CKA Birla Group

8th Floor, Birla Tower, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi, New Delhi, IN, 110001

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ckabirlagroup.com
767/1000Fair

The CKA Birla Group, is an Indian multinational conglomerate with a multibillion dollar revenue. With over 35,000 employees, the group operates more than 50 manufacturing facilities across India and the world, with a presence in diverse sectors including technology, aut...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:29,404
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Federal Finance Administration

Federal Finance Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CKA Birla Group

CKA Birla Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal Finance Administration in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CKA Birla Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Federal Finance Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Finance Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CKA Birla Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CKA Birla Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Federal Finance Administration

Federal Finance Administration

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CKA Birla Group

CKA Birla Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Federal Finance Administration company and CKA Birla Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Federal Finance Administration and CKA Birla Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Federal Finance Administration and CKA Birla Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Federal Finance Administration or CKA Birla Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Federal Finance Administration or CKA Birla Group ?
Between Federal Finance Administration and CKA Birla Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Federal Finance Administration and CKA Birla Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2