Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EF Go Ahead ToursEF Go Ahead Tours
VS
Europcar Mobility GroupEuropcar Mobility Group
EF Go Ahead Tours

EF Go Ahead Tours

Two Education Circle, Cambridge, MA, 02141, US

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile

At EF Go Ahead Tours we believe you’re never too old to be a student of the world. For 30 years we have guided individuals across the globe through carefully crafted group travel. Our travelers range from young professionals to retirees, solo travelers to entire familie...

NAICS:561
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:478
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

13 ter Boulevard Berthier, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75017

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
714/1000Moderate

Europcar Mobility Group is a global mobility player, with 75 years of mobility services expertise and a leading position in Europe. “We help to change the way you move” is what we stand for and brings us together. More than ever, we're committed to delivering simple, s...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:10,562
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EF Go Ahead Tours

EF Go Ahead Tours

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EF Go Ahead Tours in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Europcar Mobility Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EF Go Ahead Tours (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EF Go Ahead Tours cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Europcar Mobility Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Europcar Mobility Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EF Go Ahead Tours

EF Go Ahead Tours

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Europcar Mobility Group

Europcar Mobility Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EUR531040425

FAQ

Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours company and Europcar Mobility Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours and Europcar Mobility Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours and Europcar Mobility Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EF Go Ahead Tours or Europcar Mobility Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EF Go Ahead Tours or Europcar Mobility Group ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours and Europcar Mobility Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EF Go Ahead Tours and Europcar Mobility Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2