Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EFFECT PhotonicsEFFECT Photonics
VS
ASMLASML
EFFECT Photonics

EFFECT Photonics

High Tech Campus, Eindhoven, North Brabant, undefined, NL

Last Update: 23/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://effectphotonics.com/
754/1000Fair

Where Light Meets Digital - EFFECT Photonics is a highly vertically integrated, independent photonic optical systems company addressing the need for high-performance, affordable optic solutions driven by the ever-increasing demand for bandwidth and faster data transfer ...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:99
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ASML

ASML

De Run 6501, Veldhoven, 5504DR, NL

Last Update: 16/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.asml.com
821/1000Good

Who are we? ASML is an innovation leader in the global semiconductor industry. We make machines that chipmakers use to mass produce microchips. Founded in 1984 in the Netherlands with just a handful of employees, we’ve now grown to over 40,000 employees, 143 nationalit...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:35,826
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EFFECT Photonics

EFFECT Photonics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ASML

ASML

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EFFECT Photonics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

ASML has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - EFFECT Photonics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EFFECT Photonics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ASML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EFFECT Photonics

EFFECT Photonics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ASML

ASML

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ODI1771093701

FAQ

Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EFFECT Photonics company and ASML company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EFFECT Photonics and ASML, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EFFECT Photonics and ASML, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EFFECT Photonics or ASML ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EFFECT Photonics or ASML ?
Between EFFECT Photonics and ASML, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EFFECT Photonics and ASML, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA