Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Etelä-Pohjanmaan OsuuskauppaEtelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa
VS
NikeNike
Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa

Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa

Hyllykalliontie 2, Nurmo, West and Inner Finland, FI

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.eepee.fi
769/1000Fair

Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa, Eepee, on yli 94 000 asiakasomistajan omistama vähittäiskaupan monialayritys. Tuotamme kilpailukykyisesti ja kannattavasti monipuolisia palveluja ja etuja asiakasomistajillemme Toimialamme ovat: - marketkauppa - liikennemyymäläkauppa - ma...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nike

Nike

One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OR, US, 97005

Last Update: 09/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://nike.com/careers
304/1000Critical

NIKE, Inc. is a purpose-driven organization energized by a shared commitment to move the world forward through the power of sport. We champion diversity and amplify individual passions to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete* in the world. Here, every te...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:95,347
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa

Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nike

Nike

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Nike has 280.95% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nike (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nike cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa

Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nike

Nike

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NIKALC1783600235
🔒 Incident : Breach
JONGENMCDGOL1775507547
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NIK1769167310

FAQ

Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa company and Nike company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa and Nike, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa and Nike, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa or Nike ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa or Nike ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa and Nike, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Etelä-Pohjanmaan Osuuskauppa and Nike, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8