Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs » EDW1780000205

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (EDW1780000205)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-74
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident680 / 1000
Company LinkView Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs Profile
INCIDENT NUMBEREDW1780000205
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORPhishing
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and financial information
INCIDENT DATE29/04/2026
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs breach identified under incident ID EDW1780000205.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/edwards-faust-&-smith, the number of followers: 44, the industry type: Accounting and the number of employees: 10 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 680 with a difference of -74 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs and their customers.

On 28 May 2026, Edwards, Faust & Smith disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Edwards, Faust & Smith Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Client Information".

A data breach at Edwards, Faust & Smith, a certified public accounting firm based in Bangor, Maine, has exposed the sensitive personal and financial information of 928 individuals across the U.S., including 837 in Maine.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Firm computer and Remote server, and exposing Sensitive personal and financial information, with nearly 928 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Contained by May 5, 2026, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notifications sent to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Written notifications sent to affected individuals on May 28, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating phishing attack that originated from a fraudulent email posing as a prospective client and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating fraudulent email posing as a prospective client. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution (T1204) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating phishing attack...compromised a firm computer and a remote server and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating fraudulent email posing as a prospective client. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating compromised a firm computer and a remote server (implied access) and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exposed...Social Security numbers, tax return information, financial account details. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposed...names, Social Security numbers, tax return information, IRS transcripts and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised a firm computer and a remote server. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposing sensitive personal and financial information of 928 individuals. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating phishing attack compromised systems (potential data integrity impact) and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating exposed...IRS transcripts, financial account details (potential manipulation risk). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References