Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAsEdwards, Faust & Smith CPAs
VS
RSM US LLPRSM US LLP
Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs

15 Columbia Street, Bangor, 04401, US

Last Update: 28/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://efscpa.com
681/1000Weak

Edwards, Faust and Smith, CPAs was formed in 1991 by CPAs who came from a large reputable firm and wanted to provide accounting, audit, tax, and consulting services to small and mid-size businesses and individuals at the same professional standard provided by larger fir...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
RSM US LLP

RSM US LLP

30 S Wacker Dr, Chicago, 60606, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://rsmus.com/
785/1000Fair

Stay Alert: Avoid Recruitment Scams Across industries, cybercriminals are posing as company recruiters using fake job postings and employment offers to trick people into providing personal information or payment. Be alert and never provide personal/financial informati...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:19,460
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RSM US LLP

RSM US LLP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs has 10.71% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RSM US LLP in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RSM US LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RSM US LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EDW1780000205
RSM US LLP

RSM US LLP

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs company and RSM US LLP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs and RSM US LLP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs and RSM US LLP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs or RSM US LLP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs or RSM US LLP ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs and RSM US LLP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs and RSM US LLP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9