Comparison Overview
Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs
15 Columbia Street, Bangor, 04401, US
Last Update: 28/05/2026
Edwards, Faust and Smith, CPAs was formed in 1991 by CPAs who came from a large reputable firm and wanted to provide accounting, audit, tax, and consulting services to small and mid-size businesses and individuals at the same professional standard provided by larger fir...

Mazars
Tour Exaltis, Paris La Defense, 92075, FR
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Mazars is an internationally integrated partnership, specialising in audit, accountancy, advisory, tax and legal services*. Operating in over 100 countries and territories around the world, we draw on the expertise of more than 50,000 professionals – 33,000+ in Mazars’ ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs







Mazars






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)
Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs has 10.71% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mazars in 2026.
Incident History - Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mazars (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mazars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Edwards, Faust & Smith CPAs

Mazars
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.