Comparison Overview
Edward Jones

Edward Jones
12555 Manchester Road, St. Louis, MO, US, 63131
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Edward Jones is a leading North American financial services firm in the U.S. and through its affiliate in Canada. The firm’s more than 20,000 financial advisors throughout North America serve more than 9 million clients with a total of $2.2 trillion in client assets und...

Revolut
30 S Colonnade, London, E14 5HX, GB
Last Update: 06/09/2026
People deserve more from their money. More visibility, more control, and more freedom. Since 2015, Revolut has been on a mission to deliver just that. Our powerhouse of products help our 70+ million customers get more from their money every day. As we continue our ligh...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Edward Jones







Revolut






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Edward Jones in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Revolut has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Edward Jones (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edward Jones cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Revolut (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Revolut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Edward Jones

Revolut
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. Impacted is an unknown function of the file custom-x/softap/hostapd. Such manipulation of the argument wpa_passphrase leads to hard-coded credentials. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
A weakness has been identified in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file Net/NetCheckPing.cpp. This manipulation of the argument interface_name/host causes os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely.
A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This vulnerability affects the function SystemAsh of the file Apis/system.c of the component Kylin. The manipulation of the argument AlarmVoiceURL results in os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.
A vulnerability in the N-central internal API access control filter allows unauthorised access to internal APIs. This is fixed in N-central 2026.3 HF3 and 2026.4
RouterOS contains an argument-handling flaw in the SSH login path involving usernames that begin with a prohibited character, allowing for the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed, leading to privilege escalation. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated SSH session to reach the RouterOS login helper.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)
- https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/mikrotik-routeros-cve
- https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/vulnerabilities-in-mikrotik-routeros-actively-exploited/
- https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/6-49-21-long-term-is-released/272802
- https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-23-4-long-term-is-released/272801
- https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-24-2-stable-is-released/272800
- https://mikrotik.com/supportsec/september-2026-vulnerability/
- https://npratley.net/reversing-mikrotiks-silent-patch-the-routeros-7-23-4-fix-they-wouldnt-explain/