Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Edw. C. Levy Co.Edw. C. Levy Co.
VS
SkanskaSkanska
Edw. C. Levy Co.

Edw. C. Levy Co.

9300 Dix, Dearborn, 48120, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.edwclevy.com
677/1000Weak

Since 1918, the Levy Group of Companies has been providing services and solutions that are specially designed to meet the unique needs of each customer, including steel mills, construction developers, road-building companies, cement producers, agriculture and an array o...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:442
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Skanska

Skanska

Warfvinges väg 25 (Group Headquarters), Stockholm, SE, SE-112 74

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.skanska.com
782/1000Fair

Skanska Group uses knowledge & foresight to shape the way people live, work, and connect. More than 138 years in the making, we’re one of the world’s largest development and construction companies, with 2024 revenue totaling SEK 177 billion. We operate in select markets...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:23,492
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Edw. C. Levy Co.

Edw. C. Levy Co.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Skanska

Skanska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edw. C. Levy Co. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skanska in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Edw. C. Levy Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edw. C. Levy Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Skanska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skanska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Edw. C. Levy Co.

Edw. C. Levy Co.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
EDW630072525
Skanska

Skanska

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. company and Skanska company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. and Skanska, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. and Skanska, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Edw. C. Levy Co. or Skanska ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Edw. C. Levy Co. or Skanska ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. and Skanska, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Edw. C. Levy Co. and Skanska, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8