Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EDP South AmericaEDP South America
VS
GE VernovaGE Vernova
EDP South America

EDP South America

São Paulo, BR

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

EDP operates in 30 markets and is present in four regions: North America, Asia-Pacific, Europe and South America. In South America, we operate in the energy generation, transmission, networks and the free markets segments, as well as in the development, construction an...

NAICS:22111
NAICS Definition:Electric Power Generation
Employees:392
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GE Vernova

GE Vernova

58 Charles St, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02141

Last Update: 02/07/2026

View Profile
838/1000Good

GE Vernova is a purpose-built energy technology company on a mission to electrify to thrive and decarbonize the world. It is made up of three businesses -- Power, Wind, and Electrification -- with focus on accelerating the path to more reliable, affordable, and sustain...

NAICS:22111
NAICS Definition:Electric Power Generation
Employees:63,382
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EDP South America

EDP South America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GE Vernova

GE Vernova

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDP South America in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE Vernova in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EDP South America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDP South America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GE Vernova (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE Vernova cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EDP South America

EDP South America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GE Vernova

GE Vernova

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EDP South America company and GE Vernova company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EDP South America and GE Vernova, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EDP South America and GE Vernova, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EDP South America or GE Vernova ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EDP South America or GE Vernova ?
Between EDP South America and GE Vernova, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EDP South America and GE Vernova, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2