Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EDP BrasilEDP Brasil
VS
IberdrolaIberdrola
EDP Brasil

EDP Brasil

Rua Werner Von Siemens, 111, São Paulo, São Paulo , 05069-010, BR

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://brasil.edp.com
769/1000Fair

Com mais de 20 anos de atuação no Brasil, a EDP é uma das maiores empresas privadas do setor elétrico a operar em toda a cadeia de valor. A Companhia, que tem mais de 10 mil colaboradores diretos e terceirizados, atua em Transmissão, Comercialização e Soluções em Energi...

NAICS:22111
NAICS Definition:Electric Power Generation
Employees:2,407
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Iberdrola

Iberdrola

Plaza Euskadi, 5, Bilbao, Biscay, ES, 48009

Last Update: 25/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.iberdrola.com
822/1000Good

With more than 180 years of history, Iberdrola is today a global energy leader, the leading wind power producer and one of the largest electricity companies in the world in terms of stock market capitalisation. We have been committed to clean energy for more than 20 ye...

NAICS:22111
NAICS Definition:Electric Power Generation
Employees:26,958
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EDP Brasil

EDP Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Iberdrola

Iberdrola

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDP Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

Iberdrola has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - EDP Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDP Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Iberdrola (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iberdrola cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EDP Brasil

EDP Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Iberdrola

Iberdrola

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BE-IBEALSARC1776666624

FAQ

Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EDP Brasil company and Iberdrola company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EDP Brasil and Iberdrola, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EDP Brasil and Iberdrola, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EDP Brasil or Iberdrola ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EDP Brasil or Iberdrola ?
Between EDP Brasil and Iberdrola, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EDP Brasil and Iberdrola, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19756
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Dromara lamp-cloud up to 5.10.0. This affects an unknown part of the file DefGenProjectController.java of the component Code Generator. Such manipulation of the argument outputDir/parent/projectPrefix leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-19753
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in Model Context Protocol mcp-rdf-explorer 1.0.0. Affected is the function explore_url of the file src/mcp-rdf-explorer/server.py of the component MCP Server. Performing a manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73843
SUMMARY

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. Prior to 1.0.2 and 1.1.2, internal/cluster-gateway/server.go served caller-facing management APIs on the externally reachable agent listener without authentication, allowing network-reachable attackers to invoke /api/proxy/ and /api/exec/ operations, proxy the data-plane Kubernetes API, and execute commands in workload pods in multi-cluster deployments. This issue is fixed in versions 1.0.2 and 1.1.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-73842
SUMMARY

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. Prior to 1.0.3, 1.1.3, and 1.2.0-rc.2, internal/cluster-gateway/server.go exposed /api/proxy/, /api/exec/, and /api/wirelogs/ on an internal listener without requiring a client certificate or token, allowing any network-reachable caller to read tenant Kubernetes Secrets, mutate workloads, and execute commands across connected data planes. This issue is fixed in versions 1.0.3, 1.1.3, and 1.2.0-rc.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-73841
SUMMARY

OpenChoreo is a complete, open-source developer platform for Kubernetes. From 1.2.0-rc.1 until 1.2.0, internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/exec.go and internal/openchoreo-api/api/handlers/wirelogs.go authorize component:exec and wirelogs:view using the caller-supplied project query parameter instead of comp.Spec.Owner.ProjectName, allowing a user with a project-scoped grant to execute commands in and read wirelogs from components owned by other projects in the same namespace. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-13
UPDATED
Date2026-08-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8