Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EDF Business SolutionsEDF Business Solutions
VS
NextEra Energy, Inc.NextEra Energy, Inc.
EDF Business Solutions

EDF Business Solutions

90 Whitfield Street, London, W1T 4EZ, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

At EDF Business Solutions, we power Britain's large businesses and the public sector towards Net Zero. We supply energy contracts, as well as providing metering services and additional value for businesses through a suite of Net Zero renewable energy solutions. These in...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NextEra Energy, Inc.

NextEra Energy, Inc.

700 Universe Blvd, Juno Beach, FL, US, 33408

Last Update: 11/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nexteraenergy.com
832/1000Good

NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NEE) is one of the largest electric power and energy infrastructure companies in North America and is a leading provider of electricity to American homes and businesses. Headquartered in Juno Beach, Florida, NextEra Energy is a Fortune 200 co...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:12,283
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EDF Business Solutions

EDF Business Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NextEra Energy, Inc.

NextEra Energy, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDF Business Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NextEra Energy, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EDF Business Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDF Business Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NextEra Energy, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NextEra Energy, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EDF Business Solutions

EDF Business Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NextEra Energy, Inc.

NextEra Energy, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EDF Business Solutions company and NextEra Energy, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EDF Business Solutions and NextEra Energy, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EDF Business Solutions and NextEra Energy, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EDF Business Solutions or NextEra Energy, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EDF Business Solutions or NextEra Energy, Inc. ?
Between EDF Business Solutions and NextEra Energy, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EDF Business Solutions and NextEra Energy, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2