Comparison Overview
Edenred Taiwan

Edenred Taiwan
Room A1, 2F., No. 106, Sec. 5, Xinyi Rd., Xinyi Dist, Taipei, Taipei, 11047, TW
Last Update: 01/02/2026
Edenred is a leading digital platform for services and payments and the everyday companion for people at work, connecting 60 million users and 2 million partner merchants in 45 countries via close to 1 million corporate clients. Edenred offers specific-purpose payment ...

Coforge
Noida Expressway, Noida, 201304, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Coforge is a global digital services and solutions provider that fuses deep domain expertise with emerging technologies to deliver real-world business impact. With a sharp focus on select industries and an execution intensity that’s uniquely our own, Coforge has emerge...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Edenred Taiwan







Coforge






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Edenred Taiwan in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Coforge in 2026.
Incident History - Edenred Taiwan (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edenred Taiwan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Coforge (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Coforge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Edenred Taiwan

Coforge
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.