Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

エデンレッドジャパンエデンレッドジャパン
VS
RandstadRandstad
エデンレッドジャパン

エデンレッドジャパン

六本木1丁目4-5, 港区, 東京都, 106-0032, JP

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

株式会社エデンレッドジャパンは食の福利厚生「Ticket Restaurant® (チケットレストラン)」ICカードの発行代行を展開しています。1987年に創業し、グローバル企業の一員として食事補助を通じて会社と従業員の間に愛のある関係をつくることをミッションとしています。 株式会社エデンレッドジャパンのICカード「チケットレストラン」は、飲食店やコンビニを「社員食堂」のように利用できる、食の福利厚生サービスです。日本で35年以上の実績を誇り、国内最大規模の食事補助ソリューションで、導入実績3,000社以上、利用者15万人に達します...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Randstad

Randstad

Diemermere 25, Diemen, 1112 TC, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.randstad.com
740/1000Moderate

Randstad is the world’s largest talent company and a partner of choice to clients. We are committed to providing equitable opportunities to people from all backgrounds and help them remain relevant in the rapidly changing world of work. We have a deep understanding of t...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:59,562
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
エデンレッドジャパン

エデンレッドジャパン

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Randstad

Randstad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for エデンレッドジャパン in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Randstad in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - エデンレッドジャパン (X = Date, Y = Severity)

エデンレッドジャパン cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Randstad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Randstad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
エデンレッドジャパン

エデンレッドジャパン

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Randstad

Randstad

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RAN31616222

FAQ

Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Randstad company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン and Randstad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン and Randstad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - エデンレッドジャパン or Randstad ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - エデンレッドジャパン or Randstad ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン and Randstad, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン and Randstad, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1