Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

エデンレッドジャパンエデンレッドジャパン
VS
Alight SolutionsAlight Solutions
エデンレッドジャパン

エデンレッドジャパン

六本木1丁目4-5, 港区, 東京都, 106-0032, JP

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

株式会社エデンレッドジャパンは食の福利厚生「Ticket Restaurant® (チケットレストラン)」ICカードの発行代行を展開しています。1987年に創業し、グローバル企業の一員として食事補助を通じて会社と従業員の間に愛のある関係をつくることをミッションとしています。 株式会社エデンレッドジャパンのICカード「チケットレストラン」は、飲食店やコンビニを「社員食堂」のように利用できる、食の福利厚生サービスです。日本で35年以上の実績を誇り、国内最大規模の食事補助ソリューションで、導入実績3,000社以上、利用者15万人に達します...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alight Solutions

Alight Solutions

320 S Canal St., 50th floor suite 5000, Chicago, IL, US, 60606

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.alight.com
753/1000Fair

Alight is a leading cloud-based human capital technology and services provider for many of the world’s largest organizations. Through the administration of employee benefits, Alight powers confident health, wealth, leaves and wellbeing decisions for 35 million people an...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:10,747
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
エデンレッドジャパン

エデンレッドジャパン

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alight Solutions

Alight Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for エデンレッドジャパン in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alight Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - エデンレッドジャパン (X = Date, Y = Severity)

エデンレッドジャパン cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alight Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alight Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
エデンレッドジャパン

エデンレッドジャパン

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alight Solutions

Alight Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALI642072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALI731082025

FAQ

Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン company and Alight Solutions company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン and Alight Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン and Alight Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - エデンレッドジャパン or Alight Solutions ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - エデンレッドジャパン or Alight Solutions ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン and Alight Solutions, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between エデンレッドジャパン and Alight Solutions, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3