Comparison Overview
Edenred Deutschland GmbH
Edenred Deutschland GmbH
Claudius-Keller-Strasse 3C, München, 81669, DE
Last Update: 28/03/2026
Edenred ist in Deutschland der führende Anbieter von Gutscheinen und Gutscheinkarten für Mitarbeiter, Kunden und Vertriebspartner. Die Lösungen lassen persönliche Anerkennung und gezielte Belohnung wie auch nachhaltige Bindung der jeweiligen Zielgruppe zu. Das vielfä...
Guaranty Trust
Plot 635, Akin Adesola, Victoria Island, Lagos State, Nigeria, Lagos, NG
Last Update: 07/09/2026
We are Guaranty Trust. Founded in 1990, we own and operate one of Africa's best managed banking franchises, serving over 24 million customers across 10 African countries and the United Kingdom. We are Proudly African and Truly International. We believe in getting it r...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Edenred Deutschland GmbH
Guaranty Trust
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Edenred Deutschland GmbH in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Guaranty Trust has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Edenred Deutschland GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edenred Deutschland GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Guaranty Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Guaranty Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Edenred Deutschland GmbH
Guaranty Trust
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.