Comparison Overview
Edenred Belgium

Edenred Belgium
Boulevard du souverain 165 boite 9, Auderghem/Ouderghem, Belgique, 1160, BE
Last Update: 16/12/2025
Market leader in prepaid services for companies, Edenred has around 170 staff in Belgium, located in Brussels, Antwerp and Liège, 1,500,000 users and tens of thousands of affiliated businesses. The red ball, the symbol of a system created for the benefit of all, can be...

Bloomberg
731 Lexington Ave., New York, NY, US, 10022
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Bloomberg is a global leader in business and financial information, delivering trusted data, news, and insights that bring transparency and efficiency, and fairness to markets. We help connect influential communities across the global financial ecosystem via reliable te...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Edenred Belgium







Bloomberg






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Edenred Belgium in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bloomberg in 2026.
Incident History - Edenred Belgium (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edenred Belgium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bloomberg (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bloomberg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Edenred Belgium

Bloomberg
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.