Comparison Overview
Edelman Financial Engines

Edelman Financial Engines
3315 Scott Blvd, Santa Clara, 95054, US
Last Update: 24/04/2026
For more than 35 years, Edelman Financial Engines has been helping people move their financial lives forward. Our founders set the tone for our mission – giving individual investors access to sophisticated investment modeling tools that were previously available only t...

Credicorp
Calle Centenario 154, Lima, Lima, PE, 12
Last Update: 07/09/2026
Somos el grupo financiero líder en el Perú con una vasta experiencia en el mercado peruano. Contamos con una sólida plataforma de Banca Comercial reforzada por una importante presencia en Banca de Inversión en Latinoamérica destinada a desarrollar el potencial de la reg...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Edelman Financial Engines







Credicorp






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Edelman Financial Engines has 14.29% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Credicorp in 2026.
Incident History - Edelman Financial Engines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Edelman Financial Engines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Credicorp (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Credicorp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Edelman Financial Engines

Credicorp
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.