Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

EDCE EPFLEDCE EPFL
VS
Université de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
EDCE EPFL

EDCE EPFL

N/A

Last Update: 08/12/2025

View Profile

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Université de Montréal

Université de Montréal

Station Centre-ville, H3C 3J7, Montreal, Montréal, QC, CA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.umontreal.ca
799/1000Fair

Université de Montréal and its two affiliated schools, Polytechnique Montréal and HEC Montréal, is Quebec's biggest university complex and one of the largest in North America. Its 450,000 graduates make their presence felt around the globe and in every sphere of activit...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:12,048
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
EDCE EPFL

EDCE EPFL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Université de Montréal

Université de Montréal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDCE EPFL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Université de Montréal in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - EDCE EPFL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDCE EPFL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Université de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Université de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
EDCE EPFL

EDCE EPFL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Université de Montréal

Université de Montréal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between EDCE EPFL company and Université de Montréal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between EDCE EPFL and Université de Montréal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between EDCE EPFL and Université de Montréal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - EDCE EPFL or Université de Montréal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - EDCE EPFL or Université de Montréal ?
Between EDCE EPFL and Université de Montréal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between EDCE EPFL and Université de Montréal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2