Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Eczacıbaşı Yapı ÜrünleriEczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri
VS
UltraTech CementUltraTech Cement
Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri

Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri

Büyükdere Caddesi, Istanbul , 34394, TR

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vitra.com.tr
754/1000Fair

Turkey's first and biggest ceramic sanitary ware manufacturer and exporter Eczacıbaşı Building Products, has been producing sanitary ware since 1958 and bathroom furniture, bathtubs and shower trays since 1991 via its flagship VitrA brand. The Eczacıbaşı Group launched ...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:1,061
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

Mumbai, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
799/1000Fair

UltraTech Cement Ltd. is the largest manufacturer of grey cement, Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) and white cement in India. It is also one of the leading cement producers globally. UltraTech as a brand embodies 'strength', 'reliability' and 'innovation'. Together, these attri...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:27,830
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri

Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UltraTech Cement in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UltraTech Cement (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UltraTech Cement cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri

Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri and UltraTech Cement, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri and UltraTech Cement, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri or UltraTech Cement ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri or UltraTech Cement ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri and UltraTech Cement, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eczacıbaşı Yapı Ürünleri and UltraTech Cement, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2