Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ECS (Equans)ECS (Equans)
VS
AFPAAFPA
ECS (Equans)

ECS (Equans)

Industrielaan 42, Schoten, 2900, BE

Last Update: 06/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.e-c-s.be
770/1000Fair

Origins ECS was created in 1990 due to the need for: - expertise in nuclear safety; and - independent monitoring in radiation protection. Based on this expertise, ECS expanded its activities with high-quality training and support in general safety. Your safety, o...

NAICS:6114
NAICS Definition:Business Schools and Computer and Management Training
Employees:89
Subsidiaries:99
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AFPA

AFPA

Tour Cityscope - 3, rue Franklin, MONTREUIL, FR, 93100

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.afpa.fr
801/1000Good

L'AFPA, PREMIER ORGANISME DE FORMATION PROFESSIONNELLE DES ADULTES Avec plus de 140 000 personnes formées chaque année dans plus de 200 implantations partout en France, l’Afpa, devenue Agence nationale pour la formation professionnelle des adultes en janvier 2017, es...

NAICS:6114
NAICS Definition:Business Schools and Computer and Management Training
Employees:18,975
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ECS (Equans)

ECS (Equans)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AFPA

AFPA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ECS (Equans) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFPA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ECS (Equans) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ECS (Equans) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AFPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ECS (Equans)

ECS (Equans)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AFPA

AFPA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ECS (Equans) company and AFPA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ECS (Equans) and AFPA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ECS (Equans) and AFPA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ECS (Equans) or AFPA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ECS (Equans) or AFPA ?
Between ECS (Equans) and AFPA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ECS (Equans) and AFPA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3