Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ecovative - the mycelium technology companyEcovative - the mycelium technology company
VS
RegeneronRegeneron
Ecovative - the mycelium technology company

Ecovative - the mycelium technology company

70 Cohoes Avenue, Green Island, New York, undefined, US

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ecovative.com/
755/1000Fair

Ecovative uses biology to solve fundamental human needs at industrial scales and in consumer applications. Ecovative uses mycelium to grow category defining products ranging from leather like textiles to sustainable packaging to high performance foams for apparel and be...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:89
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Regeneron

Regeneron

777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, 10591, US

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.regeneron.com
823/1000Good

At Regeneron we believe that when the right idea finds the right team, powerful change is possible. As we work across our expanding global network to invent, develop and commercialize life-transforming medicines for people with serious diseases, we’re establishing new w...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:17,301
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ecovative - the mycelium technology company

Ecovative - the mycelium technology company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Regeneron

Regeneron

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ecovative - the mycelium technology company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regeneron in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ecovative - the mycelium technology company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecovative - the mycelium technology company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Regeneron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regeneron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ecovative - the mycelium technology company

Ecovative - the mycelium technology company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Regeneron

Regeneron

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company company and Regeneron company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company and Regeneron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company and Regeneron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ecovative - the mycelium technology company or Regeneron ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ecovative - the mycelium technology company or Regeneron ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company and Regeneron, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ecovative - the mycelium technology company and Regeneron, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA