Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Econocom NederlandEconocom Nederland
VS
KyndrylKyndryl
Econocom Nederland

Econocom Nederland

Computerweg 22, Utrecht, 3542, NL

Last Update: 26/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.econocom.nl
753/1000Fair

Financiering en services voor werkplekken, audiovisuele- en IT-infrastructuren. Ben je als organisatie op zoek naar professionele ondersteuning op het gebied van de digitale projecten? Dan ben je bij Econocom aan het juiste adres! Met onze duurzame oplossingen voor zow...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:231
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

New York City, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://kyndryl.com
651/1000Weak

We have the world’s best talent that design, run, and manage the most advanced and reliable technology infrastructure each day. Together, we think holistically about the health of these vital technology ecosystems. We are a focused, independent company that builds on o...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:61,535
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Econocom Nederland

Econocom Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Econocom Nederland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Kyndryl has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Econocom Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Econocom Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kyndryl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kyndryl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Econocom Nederland

Econocom Nederland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kyndryl

Kyndryl

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292
🔒 Incident : Breach
IHGHCLGAPWYNMCDVODKYNMIC1786975327

FAQ

Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Econocom Nederland company and Kyndryl company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Econocom Nederland and Kyndryl, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Econocom Nederland and Kyndryl, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Econocom Nederland or Kyndryl ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Econocom Nederland or Kyndryl ?
Between Econocom Nederland and Kyndryl, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Econocom Nederland and Kyndryl, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93436
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly clean up decode-side metadata for rejected inference requests in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Remote attackers can submit requests with max_tokens=0 to exhaust decode-worker memory without bound until the worker restarts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93435
SUMMARY

redis-parser through 3.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the RESP protocol parser that allows malicious Redis endpoints to crash the client process through unbounded recursion on nested arrays. Attackers can send crafted RESP byte streams with repeated array headers that exhaust the V8 call stack, causing an uncaught RangeError that terminates the Node.js process without triggering error handling callbacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-87701
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-85917
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85889
SUMMARY

Missing authentication for critical function in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9