Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ecobank Ghana PLCEcobank Ghana PLC
VS
PING ANPING AN
Ecobank Ghana PLC

Ecobank Ghana PLC

2 Morocco Rd., Accra, 0000, GH

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ecobank.com
762/1000Fair

Ecobank Ghana PLC (Ecobank) was incorporated on January 9, 1989 as a private limited liability company under the Companies Code to engage in the business of commercial banking. Ecobank was initially licensed, to operate as a merchant bank, by the Bank of Ghana on Novemb...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,688
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PING AN

PING AN

No. 5033 Yitian Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518046, CN

Last Update: 27/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://group.pingan.com/
830/1000Good

This is the official Company Page of Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. (HKEx: 2318; SSE: 601318; ADR: PNGAY). Ping An strives to become a world leading technology-powered financial services group. We believe the way people receive financial services an...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:51,286
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ecobank Ghana PLC

Ecobank Ghana PLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PING AN

PING AN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ecobank Ghana PLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PING AN in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ecobank Ghana PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecobank Ghana PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PING AN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PING AN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ecobank Ghana PLC

Ecobank Ghana PLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PING AN

PING AN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and PING AN company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC and PING AN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC and PING AN, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ecobank Ghana PLC or PING AN ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ecobank Ghana PLC or PING AN ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC and PING AN, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC and PING AN, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9