Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ecobank Ghana PLCEcobank Ghana PLC
VS
OTP GroupOTP Group
Ecobank Ghana PLC

Ecobank Ghana PLC

2 Morocco Rd., Accra, 0000, GH

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ecobank.com
762/1000Fair

Ecobank Ghana PLC (Ecobank) was incorporated on January 9, 1989 as a private limited liability company under the Companies Code to engage in the business of commercial banking. Ecobank was initially licensed, to operate as a merchant bank, by the Bank of Ghana on Novemb...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,688
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
OTP Group

OTP Group

Nádor u., Budapest, 1051, HU

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

OTP Group is one of the fastest growing, leading independent banking groups in Central and Eastern Europe with a bridgehead in Central Asia. It operates in 11 countries - 10 in CEE region and 1 in Uzbekistan, employing nearly 40,000 people and providing universal finan...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,040
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ecobank Ghana PLC

Ecobank Ghana PLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
OTP Group

OTP Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ecobank Ghana PLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OTP Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ecobank Ghana PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecobank Ghana PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - OTP Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OTP Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ecobank Ghana PLC

Ecobank Ghana PLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
OTP Group

OTP Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC company and OTP Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC and OTP Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC and OTP Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ecobank Ghana PLC or OTP Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ecobank Ghana PLC or OTP Group ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC and OTP Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ecobank Ghana PLC and OTP Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA