Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ecobank Cape VerdeEcobank Cape Verde
VS
DenizBankDenizBank
Ecobank Cape Verde

Ecobank Cape Verde

Avenida Cidade de Lisboa , Praia, 374-C , CV

Last Update: 28/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ecobank.com/cv
753/1000Fair

Founded in 1985 Ecobank is the leading pan-African Bank with operations in 33 countries across the continent. A Group present in 36 countries with effective banking solutions to manage and simplify your daily finances. Ecobank Cape Verde was founded in 2009 and became a...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:79
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DenizBank

DenizBank

Büyükdere Caddesi 141, Esentepe, 34394, TR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.denizbank.com
781/1000Fair

In 1997, DenizBank was acquired by the Zorlu Holding in the form of a banking license from the Privatization Administration. Undergoing three shareholder changes and done public offering in its short history, the Bank was acquired in October 2006 by Dexia, one of the le...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:11,360
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ecobank Cape Verde

Ecobank Cape Verde

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DenizBank

DenizBank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ecobank Cape Verde in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DenizBank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ecobank Cape Verde (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecobank Cape Verde cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DenizBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DenizBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ecobank Cape Verde

Ecobank Cape Verde

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DenizBank

DenizBank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde company and DenizBank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde and DenizBank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde and DenizBank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ecobank Cape Verde or DenizBank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ecobank Cape Verde or DenizBank ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde and DenizBank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ecobank Cape Verde and DenizBank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA