Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Eco Logical Australia Pty LtdEco Logical Australia Pty Ltd
VS
SUEZSUEZ
Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd

Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd

Level 13, 420 George Street, Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2000

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ecoaus.com.au/
752/1000Fair

We exist to empower people to make a difference. More than an environmental consultancy, we are advisors that our clients trust and rely on for solutions contributing to creating positive changes. As part of Tetra Tech, a global leader in consulting and engineering se...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:215
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SUEZ

SUEZ

La Défense, Paris, 92040, FR

Last Update: 10/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.suez.com
796/1000Fair

We provide essential services in the water and waste sectors to preserve resources and improve quality of life wherever we operate. As a global player for over 160 years, we support public and private actors with resilient and innovative solutions. With a presence in ...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:26,444
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd

Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SUEZ

SUEZ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SUEZ in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SUEZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SUEZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd

Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SUEZ

SUEZ

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd company and SUEZ company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and SUEZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and SUEZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd or SUEZ ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd or SUEZ ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and SUEZ, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and SUEZ, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1