Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTIONECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION
VS
NBCUniversalNBCUniversal
ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION

ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION

340 Kwun Tong Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, undefined, undefined, HK

Last Update: 31/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eca2.com
761/1000Fair

At ECA2, we create, design and produce spectacular multimedia shows. Our knowhow spans every speciality needed for innovative, immersive, multimedia projects that stand apart. We have built our reputation on an exceptional in-house ability to manage all the various tal...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:22
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NBCUniversal

NBCUniversal

30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York City, 10112-0002, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.NBCUniversal.com
809/1000Good

NBCUniversal is one of the world’s leading media and entertainment companies. We create world-class content, which we distribute across our portfolio of film, television, and streaming, and bring to life through our global theme park destinations, consumer products, and...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:42,071
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION

ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NBCUniversal

NBCUniversal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NBCUniversal in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NBCUniversal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NBCUniversal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION

ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NBCUniversal

NBCUniversal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HP909040125

FAQ

Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION company and NBCUniversal company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION and NBCUniversal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION and NBCUniversal, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION or NBCUniversal ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION or NBCUniversal ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION and NBCUniversal, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ECA2 SHOW DESIGN & PRODUCTION and NBCUniversal, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19374
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19373
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19372
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19371
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-12372
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2